Liverpool and Manchester City share the same win price at Anfield. We examine Liverpool’s chance creation, City’s defending at restarts and the difference between result and goals markets ahead of 11 October.
FINAL: Liverpool 0–3 Manchester City
Sunday 11 October 2026, Anfield · Premier League matchweek 6
Manchester City won 3–0 at Anfield, handing Liverpool their first league defeat of the season. Erling Haaland, Jérémy Doku and Rayan Cherki scored within 13 minutes as City made it six wins from six.
A mixed afternoon for us. Manchester City at 31/20 was the full-time price that landed. But we said the prices left the draw firmly in the picture, and City won comfortably. Both teams to score at 1/2 was confidently priced and missed: Liverpool didn’t score, and Alexander Isak and Cody Gakpo weren’t in their matchday squad on ESPN’s team sheet. Ryan Gravenberch’s second yellow card on 62 minutes turned it, and City scored three times in the next 16 minutes. One for the ‘we’ll take the half credit’ file.
Score confirmed by premierleague.com and ESPN.
Manchester City have the shorter win price at Anfield, but only just. Liverpool at 13/8 and City at 31/20 leave a draw firmly in the picture; the more revealing question is how Liverpool create chances against a side that conceded three goals in its last league game.
Liverpool have kept three successive league clean sheets. City arrive with five wins over its last five games, while the fitness of Alexander Isak and Cody Gakpo complicates the case for goals at both ends.
Sunday 11 October 2026 · 4.30pm BST · Premier League · Anfield. City’s official match preview confirms the kick-off and that this is their first game back after the international break. See our Premier League fixtures and previews for the wider schedule.
| Market | Selection | Fractional odds |
|---|---|---|
| Full-time result | Liverpool | 13/8 |
| Full-time result | Draw | 13/5 |
| Full-time result | Manchester City | 31/20 |
| Both teams to score | Yes | 1/2 |
These prices imply about 38.1% for Liverpool, 27.8% for the draw and 39.2% for City, calculated as one divided by each decimal price. The total is roughly 105.1%, including the bookmaker’s margin. They are price-derived figures, not our forecast: City’s small advantage in the win market still leaves plenty of room for a draw.
Liverpool’s league results show two wins and three draws, with seven goals scored and four conceded. Their home games finished 2–2 against Nottingham Forest and 0–0 against Fulham; the wins came at Ipswich and Bournemouth. That unbeaten start includes three consecutive clean sheets, but two Anfield draws are too small a sample to establish a dependable home pattern.
The winner in the 1–0 victory at Bournemouth gives a better picture of what Liverpool need in attack. Gakpo beat two defenders on the right and crossed; Wirtz got a touch before Isak finished inside the box. Alisson also had to deny Evanilson, so the clean sheet did not mean Bournemouth went without chances.
For City, stopping the delivery at source would prevent that move from reaching its dangerous final stage. Liverpool’s task is to get a wide player past his marker while keeping enough support near the striker. The Bournemouth sequence shows how that can work, though the personnel available on Sunday may change both ends of the move.
City won all five league games before the break, but their 5–3 win over Sunderland on 20 September exposed a specific problem. Enzo Maresca singled out two conceded goals from free-kicks, one taken quickly, as too easy. His side found enough goals to win despite those lapses.
Liverpool can test whether City organise themselves quickly after conceding a foul. An early pass or delivery could catch a runner before his marker is set; waiting lets the visitors recover their positions. That is a route to examine, rather than a prediction of a set-piece goal. One eight-goal match does not establish how this one will unfold.
City also return with their disciplinary case under appeal. In their official statement, the club confirmed lodging an appeal on 1 October against the Premier League Commission’s decision.
In Liverpool’s account of Iraola’s beIN SPORTS interview, the head coach said Isak and Gakpo were still injured and their involvement depended on recovering in time. He did not rule either out against City. Iraola also described the balance he is seeking: better control has come with less attacking fluidity.
Those fitness doubts affect different jobs. Gakpo supplied the run and delivery for the Bournemouth winner; Isak supplied the finish. If one misses out, Liverpool need to replace that contribution. If both miss out, the argument for repeating that combination becomes much weaker, even if the replacement attack contains capable players.
That makes the confirmed starting team relevant to the goals market. A player’s presence in a goalscorer list does not confirm his fitness, and a place among the substitutes does not promise a full match.
Both teams to score — Yes, 1/2: City’s scoring run and their restart lapses against Sunderland give this market a football argument to examine. It asks whether each side scores at least once, regardless of who wins. Liverpool’s ability to turn wide possession into a chance, as at Bournemouth, is the home side’s part of that argument.
The strongest objection is Liverpool’s run of three league clean sheets, compounded by doubts over two players involved in their last winning goal. BTTS Yes needs Liverpool to score and to concede; either part can fail. The line-up could weaken the attacking case further, and the 1/2 price does not itself demonstrate value.
BTTS and over 2.5 goals also answer different questions: 1–1 satisfies BTTS only, while 3–0 satisfies over 2.5 only. Our football betting terms guide explains the market language. For account access, use the Bet365 Sports registration page; this is a general registration destination.
Please gamble responsibly. Safer gambling support
18+ Worried about your gambling? Gamcare - When the fun stops – STOP!